I believe
that there is a “Universal Energy”, from which all other forms of energy are
derived.
Overview
I believe
that there is a “universal energy”. This is the main entity that “is” energy.
All the variations of energy are permutations of this one energy.
If we
manipulate this “universal energy” in different ways, this will result in the
different energies we know (such as electric, magnetic, and gravitational).
I further
conclude that the same structure and composition of the “universal energy”
which creates electrical energy etc. will also affect two other properties:
swim rate, and mass density.
For
example, in order to get electrical energy, we manipulate the universal energy
in a specific way. This is how we create the electrical energy from the
universal energy. At the same time, the very physical structure which creates
“electrical energy” will also affect the swim rate of the electrical energy
units, and thus the overall flow rate of the electrical energy string.
Furthermore,
this same physical composition of universal energy which create the form known
as electrical energy…will also affect how easy it is to create mass, and
therefore affect the mass density.
These
same general factors exist for all types of energy currently known to science,
including: nuclear binding energy, electric energy, magnetic energy, and
gravitational energy. Each one of these energies is actually a specific form of
the “universal energy”. By manipulating the universal energy in particular ways
we get each type of energy. In addition, these forms of the universal energy
will also affect the swim rate of the energy units; the overall flow rate of
the energy; and the density of mass spots. We will explore all of these ideas
in the following article.
“Universal Energy”
Before we
proceed further, I must introduce the concept of “universal energy”. If all
fundamental types of energy can be converted into the others, then there must
be some type of energy which is common to all these energies. There must be a
single “universal energy”, which can then be manipulated in various ways, to
create each of the other types of energies.
I
actually have a theory for the nature of this universal energy, but I will not
discuss it at this time.
Yet at
this time we can declare that this universal energy exists. And from this
universal energy, we can create the other types of energies.
Differences in the
Energy Units
What
makes the difference in these energy units? There are several possibilities,
and combinations of these possibilities may be involved. The three main factors
which may vary from one type of energy to another are:
1. More
Universal Energy in Each Energy Unit
2.
Different Physical Structures
3. Energy
Fish Can Swim at Different Rates
We will
describe each of these factors below. Note that #1 and #3 may be related. Also
note that we will be spending the majority of the article discussing effects
from #3, in conjunction with #1.
1. More Energy per Unit
Just
there are smaller fish and larger fish, there may also be smaller energy units
and larger energy units. If we put more of the “universal energy” together into
one “energy fish”, then this will produce a larger energy fish. This may in
fact perform as a different type of energy.
2. Different physical structure,
different geometric shape
The
universal energy may also come in different physical structures, in different geometric
shapes. We know that materials made of the same chemical, when crystallized
into different geometric shapes, will have different properties. The same could
be said of our energy types. Thus, if we not only have different amounts of the
universal energy, but shape that universal energy into different ways, then we
can create energy objects which have different physical properties.
As an
analogy, consider the art of origami. Starting with the same piece of paper, we
can create a variety of shapes and objects. The same is true of our Universal
Energy in the creation of all other types of energy. We begin with our
universal energy, then manipulate that energy in a similar way that we shape a
sheet of paper. The result is a 3-Dimensional structural shape of energy.
Thus, if
we shape the universal energy in different ways, similar to the way we shape a
sheet of paper in different ways, then we will get a variety of different
shapes of energy. Each of these different 3-Dimensional shapes of energy will
be one of the main differences between each type of specific energy.
Also
remember that these different shapes of energy are the different shapes of our
energy units, the different shapes of our “energy fish”. Each energy unit is
“folded” in this specific shape, and propels itself forward, along with all the
other similarly shaped energy units.
Therefore:
if we put the universal energy units into different geometric shapes, yet still
in the general form of energy fish that vibrate, with energy strings as
collective gatherings of these energy units…then we may in fact get energy
which acts in different ways. We may have one of the reasons for the difference
between electric, magnetic, and gravitational energies.
3. Swimming at Different Rates
One of
the most significant differences between types of energy fish is the rate at
which they swim. Consider the action of a fish. The fish wiggles back and
forth. The fish can also propel itself forward. Yet what is the rate at which
this fish wiggles? What is the rate at which this fish propels forward?
I believe
that the rate at which the energy fish wiggles, the rate at which that energy
fish swims, is a major factor in the type of energy produced.
This will
be noticed on a larger scale, when we have many of these energy fish units
swimming together.
Thus: if
the energy units swim slowly, then the energy string (a school of that energy
fish) will undulate slowly. Then, when we consider a large object composed
solely of collective energy strings, this object of collective energy strings
will be observed undulating slowly and moving slowly.
Conversely,
if the energy units swim faster, then the energy string (school of those energy
fish) will undulate faster. When objects are composed entirely of this
collective energy units, these objects will appear to undulate faster.
On the
level of individual field strings: the difference between electric, magnetic,
and gravitational energies could be as simple as the rate at which the
individual energy units swim…and thus the rate at which the energy strings
composed of those energy units seems to undulate.
Amount of Universal
Energy and the Resulting Swim Rate
Note that
the swim rate may in fact be related to the amount of universal energy in the
energy unit (energy fish). When more of the “universal energy” is compacted
into one energy fish, this may allow that energy fish to wiggle and swim at
higher rates.
Taken Together: The
Differences Between Specific Energy Types
Now let
us consider all the factors together which make each specific type of energy. We
begin with the “Universal Energy”. This is the basic energy which we use to
create all other types of energy. We then use three factors to create the
specific types of energy which are derived from this universal energy.
First we
add different amounts of universal energy into one energy unit. Just as we can
add more flour to a recipe and get different results, if we add more energy and
compact that energy into one energy unit, we can get different results.
We
already know that some types of energy seem to be stronger than others. For
example, nuclear binding energy seems to be very strong, whereas gravitational
energy seems to be very weak. We can now explain this observation as the amount
of “universal energy” which is placed into each energy unit of type.
Then we
can take that total amount of energy, and shape it in different ways. We can
fold and manipulate this energy in a variety of different ways, resulting in
highly complex 3-Dimensional structures. (And in some cases possibly
4-Dimensional and 5-Dimensional structures).
Each of
these complex shapes are composed of the universal energy, only with different
amounts of that energy and shaped in different ways. Yet the energy will cause
the energy unit to propel itself forward…as a specific type of “energy fish”.
Finally
we consider the swim rate of the energy unit. Each of these structures is
composed of the basic “universal energy”, and therefore will propel itself
forward. The universal energy in the structure will cause the energy fish to
wiggle, and to propel itself forward. Yet the rate at which this energy fish
wiggles and moves forward depends on 1) the amount of universal energy in that
particular structure, and 2) the particular origami shape of that particular
structure.
With more
universal energy, the particular energy type will wiggle faster, and propel
faster. With less universal energy, the particular energy type will wiggle
slower, and propel itself more slowly.
The
effect of the structural shape of the energy unit is more difficult to
generalize. However it is clear that the different energy flows of any
structure will affect the overall vibration and rate of motion of that objects.
This is true whether we are talking about vehicles, particles, or the
structures of our energy units.
Swim Rate and Types
of Energy
Now we
are ready to discuss the correlation between swim rate and type of energy. As
discussed above, the swim rate – including both the wiggle and the rate of
propelling itself forward – depends on two factors: the amount of universal
energy in the energy fish; and the structure of the energy shape (and thus the
flow paths of the energy in the structure). Of the four most common energy
types, the order of swim rate is as follows: nuclear; electrical; magnetic;
gravitational.
Nuclear
Energy Swim Rate
The nuclear energy fish have the greatest amount of universal energy. They are
also shaped in a way which allows the nuclear binding between nuclei to be very
strong. These energy fish, I believe, are somewhat stocky in shape.
When
free, these energy fish have an extremely high swim rate. In fact I believe it
is partially due to this fast swim rate that the particles are held together:
the energy fish swim very fast round and round between the two particles, and
hence keep the particles from moving apart.
However,
we do not usually see these energy units, because most of them are busy holding
the nuclei together. The energy with the fastest swim rate that we usually
observe is the electrical energy fish.
Electrical
Energy Swim Rate
The electrical energy fish have the next greatest amount of universal energy,
and therefore the next fastest swim rate. We know that electrical energy has an
extremely high swim rate because of the rate at which electrical energy
travels.
For example
electrical current in a high voltage wire travels close to the speed of photons
in the air. Lighting is electrical current which can travel thousands of feet
in a fraction of a second. Glitches in electronics are caused by energy strings
which jump from one wire to a neighboring wire. Each of these activities for
electrical energy strings occurs extremely quickly. Therefore we can be certain
that the electrical energy fish have extremely high swim rates – wiggling
quickly, and propelling through empty space at extremely fast speeds.
Magnetic
Energy Swim Rate
The next in the list of swim rates is the magnetic energy. I place the swim
rate of the magnetic energy down here because it seems to me that the magnetic
energy does not do much independent traveling. Consequently, this means that
the magnetic energy fish have a much slower swim rate than other energy types.
As I
study magnetic energy, it seems that magnetic energy stays mostly in permanent
loops. Whether loops around the earth, or loops around a small magnet, it seems
that much of the magnetic energy is essentially fixed in one place. Of course
it can move on its own, and in some cases does move away from the source, yet
this is not the majority of the cases involving magnetic energy.
Therefore,
what I envision for most cases of magnetic energy is a series of loops,
composed of magnetic energy fish, flowing in a continuous circle, almost
forever. These magnetic energy fish will tend to stay in their loops precisely
because they do not have the swim rate that electrical energy has. Less likely
to swim off in another direction. The net result is similar to a gentle flowing
river; the magnetic energy fish tend to stay as a group, and continue to flow
around the source as a continuous stream.
However,
the magnetic energy fish do have significant energy. Their energy is enough
provide a continuous flow. Furthermore, in many cases, the flow of the magnetic
energy fish in these loops is fast enough to be blockade for incoming energies
and micro particles.
Gravitational
Energy Swim Rate
The gravitational energy fish have the slowest swim rates of all the known
energy types. This is obvious from what we know about gravitational energy.
Gravitational energy is the weakest energy. It is exists as thin, wispy
strings. Clearly, the energy fish in each gravity string have very little of
the universal energy (compared to magnetic and electrical energy).
Consequently, the gravitational energy fish also have a slow swim rate. They
wiggle much more slowly, and they propel themselves more slowly. This causes
the gravity strings to be wispy, and wave in the air very gently.
Concluding Thoughts
I have
studied Energy in a variety of forms. During my many years of study and
insights, I have come to believe that there is a Universal Energy, from which
all other forms of energy are derived. By aggregating the universal energy in
different amounts, and manipulating the structure of the universal energy into
various 3-D structures (and 4-D, 5-D structures) we can create each specific
type of energy.
In
addition to creating the specific types of energy, these methods also create
the amount of energy per energy fish, as well as the swim rate. This, I
believe, is the reason why electrical energy has such high energy and moves
quickly; gravitational energy has lower energy and moves slowly; while magnetic
energy is relatively constant and stable.
Next
article: Relation of Amount of Universal Energy per Unit, and the Resulting
amount of Mass Spots
No comments:
Post a Comment